Chapter 04
Ti and Yong
Subject-object functional relation
Introduction
This textbook chapter focuses on question-led structured interpretation.
The aim is to translate symbolic signals into practical scenario pathways.
This chapter trains Ti/Yong assignment discipline for role-accurate interpretation.
Learning Objectives
- • Explain chapter concept scope
- • Apply a casting/reading workflow
- • Produce conditional action pathways
Prerequisites
- • Recommended: Chapter 03
- • Basic question-scoping awareness
Core Concepts
- • Ti-Yong relation
- • Subject-object function
- • Priority weighting
1. Concept scope: Defining Ti and Yong
Start by bounding the question and confirming this chapter method is fit for scope.
Divination study should prioritize transparent structure over mystical language.
If input quality is weak, pause interpretation and repair the input first.
Ti/Yong should be assigned by question function, not by habit. Re-check assignment when question objective changes.
Ti/Yong assignment should be objective-driven.
2. Structured process: Role switching by context
Use the sequence: question definition, input validation, relation reading, conditional recommendation.
Provide at least a baseline and an alternative pathway with clear switching signals.
Attach timing assumptions to each pathway so beginners can learn pacing logic.
If interpretation feels contradictory, test whether Ti/Yong assignment is misaligned before changing conclusions.
Re-check assignment when outputs conflict.
3. Applied output: Priority calibration in decision outputs
Final outputs should include action sequence, timing window, and review checkpoints.
Split recommendations by use-case rather than giving one generic statement.
Keep language conditional and avoid certainty claims to maintain interpretation integrity.
For beginners, write Ti and Yong explicitly at the top of notes before reading details.
Document assignment logic for future review.
Ti-Yong Assignment Guide
| Question type | Likely Ti | Likely Yong |
|---|---|---|
| Personal decision | Decision maker state | Target condition or objective |
| Partnership issue | Primary concern side | Counterpart or relationship demand |
| Timing question | Current state | Upcoming phase requirement |
Classical Terms
Ti: Subject-side anchor in a given question structure.
Yong: Functional objective or counterpart side.
Modern Interpretation
- • Scope before conclusions
- • Conditions before recommendations
- • Pathways before verdicts
Examples
Ti-Yong mapping case: Map Ti/Yong for a negotiation question and identify role-shift triggers.
Common Misunderstandings
Ti is always self and Yong always other. Ti/Yong assignment depends on question objective and frame.
Glossary
Ti assignment: How the subject anchor is determined by question framing.
Yong objective: The functional target or counterpart role in interpretation.